One approach to identify tenant demands is to notice what architects and designers are currently trying to create for clients in brand new buildings. A building’s objective is to supply office space. Tenants are often looking for space that can address these problems as versatility space preparation, environmental concerns, and personal temperature comfort. A specific spot for national tenants would be to acquire the highest degree of productivity. This normally implies the building will require plenty of HVAC zone office hours and supplemental systems. These variables point to an often and flexible HVAC system which may meet with tenants’ needs.
Architectural trends can also create new loads and requirements for an HVAC system in a present facility. Light can increase heat lots; atrium designs may block air distribution zones can increase the volume of ventilated atmosphere required, the number of heat to be rejected as well as the quantity of outdoor air needed. If a building does not have a flexible HVAC plant, then alterations or upgrades to the HVAC system will be necessary to compete with building design and technology.
One factor that has to be considered in any analysis of a possible retrofit is that an HVAC update usually suggests the construction needs to be brought into compliance with all current codes. Some codes are based on regulations nonetheless, the trend to create a safer and healthier indoor environment may bring new performance requirements. For instance, the proportion of outside air has slowly been improved, then many buildings have the capability to condition and outdoor air may be called for by requirements. Bringing the building up may demand a significant investment in upgrades beyond those initially planned. ApplewoodAir
Earning Retrofit Decisions
HVAC systems are major energy consumers, and new HVAC technology is a lot more efficient than 15 to 20-year-old systems set up in buildings. Sometimes, the energy savings are so significant that they warrant the investment. But in many commercial office buildings, it can be tricky to justify an HVAC update. Some updates have been performed reducing the energy savings offered. Or perhaps the owner has a payback-period need for energy updates.
When energy savings do not clearly justify an upgrade, how can the facility executive accountable for a commercial office construction ascertain whether and how to upgrade the HVAC system? It’s ideal to start with the building profile. A comparatively small or mid-sized building (less than 200,000 square feet) may present marketing opportunities not available to larger facilities. As an example, instead of converting a constant-volume system to variable-air-volume (VAV), it might be possible to make each floor a separate zone. The marketing plan could then be altered to focus on whole-floor users.
In a moderate or large-sized building, upgrade options will depend more on the type of system already in place. There isn’t much option In the event the base building process is a constant volume system, together with the fans providing air temperatures into businesses of the building. The center executive may need to increase the zoning abilities to serve the needs of today’s tenants. How this is accomplished is dependent upon the building’s design and business plan.
For example, new speculative office buildings occasionally install heat pumps, which may deliver cooling or heating to little or massive zones, are easily programmable and function at about 50 cents a ton per hour. However, is the very first cost for installing heating pumps a good value for retrofits? Probably not if the building was configured as a constant-volume or multi-zone system. Utilizing heat pumps would require conducting condenser piping through the building and changing the fresh air supply; what is more, the conversion couldn’t run parallel to the older system when this retrofit was tried in the summertime since the tower would be reused.
In this case, choices for conversion should be limited to some VAV conversion or into individual zone diffusing that does not reduce energy prices but does create comfort zones like VAV systems. VAV systems offer a constant temperature to distance, but the atmosphere volume varies with the comfort setting. It probably has some kind of VAV system, if the building was constructed after 1975. The earlier systems did provide zone formation that is simple; however, after-hour and flexible operation were usually not part of their operating system. https://www.applewoodair.com/site/brampton-hvac
The hardest VAV retrofit conclusions are the ones where the payback linked to energy reduction has already been captured by vortex dampers or by the subsequent addition of variable frequency drives. If the facility won’t receive the first influx of energy savings, HVAC retrofits will have to be warranted based on versatility, after-hour operation, and supplemental. The facility executive has to devote the time required to comprehend the value to the asset from a marketing perspective.
It’s important that values are considered when making a decision. More is involved than just the price of energy. There’ll be gains which are not so obvious. A new cooling tower or chiller that is brand new not only operates with kilowatts a ton, but it also has much better part-load skills, heat transfer surfaces and reduces maintenance requirements. Once it is segregated from operating expenses the quantity of work and maintenance necessary to support an HVAC system can be quite a surprise.
The facility executive should also look at the useful life of the existing system. Will there be parts available next year? Is there? When a decision is made to sell the construction will the machine be flagged as unserviceable? Can the machine be used when a major block of space comes up in two decades? These are all questions to ask when the reliability of building systems becomes a factor in the marketplace and when a system is currently facing obsolescence. www.applewoodair.com/site/home